College Athletes -- Pay for Play? Essay -- College Sports Salary Playe

College Athletes -- Pay for Play? in that location have been ongoing arguments oer the past decade of whether or not college athletes should be nonrecreational to repair. legion(predicate) argue that they do not have epoch to get certain jobs because the requirements for the sport that they participate in are far too demanding. Others credit entry that these athletes are provided full scholarships to attend the schools at which they are act asing the sport. even regardless of the argument, I still feel that college athletes should NOT be feeing(a) to play. College athletes are not forced into playing the sport that they have give their sequence to during their years in secondary education. They continue to play into the college aim for their love of the game. And for this, many college athletes are offered full scholarships. Todays culture for many schools are so expensive that without the scholarships that some of the schoolchilds receive, they would not be able to attend college at all. For these scholars, college sports offer a great thoroughfare to obtain an education that otherwise would not have been available for them. This allows them luck to dissect something that they can use to build a better behavior for themselves and their families. galore(postnominal) people believe that the money generated from the sports played by these kids should be given back to them as they are the ones drawing the fans to these events. How constantly some true(a)ize how little schools actually gain money by combat-ready in the National Colligate Athletics Association. A recent subject area conducted by USA today showed that there are only 40 schools that consistently turn profits from the sports that they host. (Whiteside, USAtoday.com) This means that out of approximately two hundred schools who participate in division one sports, only 1/5 actually would have money available to give back to the scholar athletes. Furthermore, it would be unfa ir to provide the students who play the sports, the money that is generated from their events, preferably and thusly putting the money back into the schools. Although these students participate and spend much of their time playing, they are no more special then the average student who attends the school. Putting the money back into the school itself allows alwaysyone a better education, kind of then just a few students, some spending money.thither are also arguments that because of the rigorous sch... ... says Myles Brand the president of the NCAA. (USAtoday.com) The program continually complains that providing players unsanctioned funds spoils fair competition between teams, because some players give only want to go to schools with a reputation for providing players extras such as money, cars etc.While there are several arguments for a comprise for play program, the downside to these arguments outweigh any chance of a program ever being put into action. The NCAA maintains t hat it impart never allow for such programs but they are trying to allow more freedoms to student athletes. These freedoms include large monthly stipends, and more money allowed per year in the Special supporter Fund. If these adjustments can be made I feel as though it will never be necessary for a pay for play program, and the NCAA can maintain the integrity it hopes to achieve.Work Cited Page1) Whiteside, Kelly (cc4) College Athletes Want a cut of the Action-http//www.usatoday.com/sports/2006-08-31-top-ten-number-7_x.htm (accessed November 28, 2006)2) Fleck Jon (2002) College Athletespay for play?- http//www.buzzle.com/editorials/1-9-2006-9123.asp (Accessed November 28, 2006) College Athletes -- Pay for Play? look for -- College Sports Salary PlayeCollege Athletes -- Pay for Play? There have been ongoing arguments all over the past decade of whether or not college athletes should be paid to play. Many argue that they do not have time to get real jobs bec ause the requirements for the sport that they participate in are far too demanding. Others bear on that these athletes are provided full scholarships to attend the schools at which they are playing the sport. still regardless of the argument, I still feel that college athletes should NOT be paid to play. College athletes are not forced into playing the sport that they have utilise their time to during their years in secondary education. They continue to play into the college level for their love of the game. And for this, many college athletes are offered full scholarships. Todays discipline for many schools are so expensive that without the scholarships that some of the students receive, they would not be able to attend college at all. For these students, college sports offer a great driveway to obtain an education that otherwise would not have been available for them. This allows them hazard to study something that they can use to build a better biography for themselves and their families. Many people believe that the money generated from the sports played by these kids should be given back to them as they are the ones drawing the fans to these events. However few realize how little schools actually gain money by move in the National Colligate Athletics Association. A recent study conducted by USA today showed that there are only 40 schools that consistently turn profits from the sports that they host. (Whiteside, USAtoday.com) This means that out of approximately 200 schools who participate in division one sports, only 1/5 actually would have money available to give back to the student athletes. Furthermore, it would be unfair to provide the students who play the sports, the money that is generated from their events, rather then putting the money back into the schools. Although these students participate and spend much of their time playing, they are no more special then the average student who attends the school. Putting the money back into the sch ool itself allows everyone a better education, rather then just a few students, some spending money.There are also arguments that because of the rigorous sch... ... says Myles Brand the president of the NCAA. (USAtoday.com) The program continually complains that providing players unsanctioned funds spoils fair competition between teams, because some players will only want to go to schools with a reputation for providing players extras such as money, cars etc.While there are several arguments for a pay for play program, the downside to these arguments outweigh any chance of a program ever being put into action. The NCAA maintains that it will never allow for such programs hitherto they are trying to allow more freedoms to student athletes. These freedoms include larger monthly stipends, and more money allowed per year in the Special financial aid Fund. If these adjustments can be made I feel as though it will never be necessary for a pay for play program, and the NCAA can maintai n the integrity it hopes to achieve.Work Cited Page1) Whiteside, Kelly (2004) College Athletes Want a cut of the Action-http//www.usatoday.com/sports/2006-08-31-top-ten-number-7_x.htm (accessed November 28, 2006)2) Fleck Jon (2002) College Athletespay for play?- http//www.buzzle.com/editorials/1-9-2006-9123.asp (Accessed November 28, 2006)