Descartes Proof For The Existence Of God Essay -- essays research pape

Descartes Proof for the Existence of theologyThe purpose of my hear depart be to watch Descartes argument for the domain of God. First, I pass on review Descartes check for the existence of God. Then I will examine the reasons that Descartes has for proving Gods existence. I will also discuss more or less consequences that appear as a result of Gods existence. Fin eachy, I will point out some complications and problems that exist within the proof. The sancti one(a)d problem with most religions in the world has always been that they presuppose reliance that is one cannot be reasoned into believing in a religion, if such was not the case then we would apply seen a huge migration to one religion or another. In all given religion, the main proof of Gods existence is the detail that scriptures -- whichever ones they may be -- maintain us of his existence and his powers. Then again, we solely believe in these scriptures because we venture that they come from God. Generall y saying, this is a circular argument that cannot be apply as a proof. We would all like to believe that we believe in God and our given religion because of faith. unless what is faith? And how can a Jew, a Christian or a Muslim all have the same certainty about their given religions without being in any doubt of their minds as to the certainty of their religions and faith. Descartes set out to build a set of arguments designed to prove Gods existence. On those, he constructed all of his other arguments. His goal in proving Gods existence was dual he wanted to build ground to base his arguments on, that is that he exists ...etc. That goal will not be discussed in too more than depth in this paper. It is his other goal to prove beyond a doubt Gods existence to all non-believers. Descartes starts by rejecting all his beliefs, so that he would not be misleaded by any misconceptions from stint the truth. He notices that by doubting all of his previous ideas he is cerebration in. De scartes determines that in order for him to entail, he must exist. He states that he knows that to be the case beyond any doubt, and that this is the first principle of the philosophy he is seeking. From that single observation he deduces a rule that he will build his entire argument upon. Descartes notices that the idea of his existence is very substantiate and distinct in his mind based upon this clarity, and the fact that he has fair determined his own e... ...t would have to necessarily exist. It is difficult to understand because on the dot as we can think of a God, we can think of a being so absolutely imperfect that it does not exist, since existence is perfection. But since it has an objective reality, according to Descartes, it must have a formal reality, what is roughly impossible. Descartes was obviously a man of great intelligence, who influenced the course of progress of westerly Civilization. His inventions in the fields of Philosophy, Mathematics, Geometry, and science as a whole are undeniable. In his work he was very modest, always states himself no more gifted than anyone, but we can feel arrogance in his conclusions. For example, only his method would deliver humanity, he will complete the debate of Gods existence, his judgment is right to describe characteristics of God, etc. I think Descartes succeeded in some parts of his proof for the existence of God, but failed in proving Gods existence from a logical point of view. The fact that there are educated men of all religions proves that anybody can be right in his own description of existence of God. Rene Descartes, Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy.